دورية أكاديمية

Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties
المؤلفون: Fawzia E. M. Elbashir, Wassim Ksouri, Mohamed Hassan Eisa, Sitah Alanazi, Farouk Habbani, Abdelmoneim Sulieman, David A. Bradley, Ibrahim I. Suliman
المصدر: Life, Vol 12, Iss 1, p 31 (2021)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: LCC:Science
مصطلحات موضوعية: radiation dosimetry, radiotherapy, medical LINAC, ionisation chamber, absorbed dose standards, Science
الوصف: This paper presents guidelines for the calibration of radiation beams that were issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA TRS 398), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM TG 51) and the German task group (DIN 6800-2). These protocols are based on the use of an ionization chamber calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in a standard laboratory’s reference quality beam, where the previous protocols were based on air kerma standards. This study aims to determine uncertainties in dosimetry for electron beam radiotherapy using internationally established high-energy radiotherapy beam calibration standards. Methods: Dw was determined in 6-, 12- and 18 MeV electron energies under reference conditions using three cylindrical and two plane-parallel ion chambers in concert with the IAEA TRS 398, AAPM TG 51 and DIN 6800-2 absorbed dose protocols. From mean measured Dw values, the ratio TRS 398/TG 51 was found to vary between 0.988 and 1.004, while for the counterpart TRS 398/DIN 6800-2 and TG 51/DIN 6800-2, the variation ranges were 0.991–1.003 and 0.997–1.005, respectively. For the cylindrical chambers, the relative combined uncertainty (k = 1) in absorbed dose measurements was 1.44%, while for the plane-parallel chambers, it ranged from 1.53 to 1.88%. Conclusions: A high degree of consistency was demonstrated among the three protocols. It is suggested that in the use of the presently determined dose conversion factors across the three protocols, dose intercomparisons can be facilitated between radiotherapy centres.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2075-1729
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/1/31; https://doaj.org/toc/2075-1729
DOI: 10.3390/life12010031
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/f09134f8d7fd459eb7cd709e7d0fb0ea
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.f09134f8d7fd459eb7cd709e7d0fb0ea
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20751729
DOI:10.3390/life12010031