دورية أكاديمية

Hospital recruitment for a pragmatic cluster-randomized clinical trial: Lessons learned from the COMPASS study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Hospital recruitment for a pragmatic cluster-randomized clinical trial: Lessons learned from the COMPASS study
المؤلفون: Anna M. Johnson, Sara B. Jones, Pamela W. Duncan, Cheryl D. Bushnell, Sylvia W. Coleman, Laurie H. Mettam, Anna M. Kucharska-Newton, Mysha E. Sissine, Wayne D. Rosamond
المصدر: Trials, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2018)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine (General)
مصطلحات موضوعية: Hospital recruitment, Pragmatic, Cluster-randomized, Clinical trial, Stroke, Post-acute care, Medicine (General), R5-920
الوصف: Abstract Background Pragmatic randomized clinical trials are essential to determine the effectiveness of interventions in “real-world” clinical practice. These trials frequently use a cluster-randomized methodology, with randomization at the site level. Despite policymakers’ increased interest in supporting pragmatic randomized clinical trials, no studies to date have reported on the unique recruitment challenges faced by cluster-randomized pragmatic trials. We investigated key challenges and successful strategies for hospital recruitment in the Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study. Methods The COMPASS study is designed to compare the effectiveness of the COMPASS model versus usual care in improving functional outcomes, reducing the numbers of hospital readmissions, and reducing caregiver strain for patients discharged home after stroke or transient ischemic attack. This model integrates early supported discharge planning with transitional care management, including nurse-led follow-up phone calls after 2, 30, and 60 days and an in-person clinic visit at 7–14 days involving a functional assessment and neurological examination. We present descriptive statistics of the characteristics of successfully recruited hospitals compared with all eligible hospitals, reasons for non-participation, and effective recruitment strategies. Results We successfully recruited 41 (43%) of 95 eligible North Carolina hospitals. Leading, non-exclusive reasons for non-participation included: insufficient staff or financial resources (n = 33, 61%), lack of health system support (n = 16, 30%), and lack of support of individual decision-makers (n = 11, 20%). Successful recruitment strategies included: building and nurturing relationships, engaging team members and community partners with a diverse skill mix, identifying gatekeepers, finding mutually beneficial solutions, having a central institutional review board, sharing published pilot data, and integrating contracts and review board administrators. Conclusions Although we incorporated strategies based on the best available evidence at the outset of the study, hospital recruitment required three times as much time and considerably more staff than anticipated. To reach our goal, we tailored strategies to individuals, hospitals, and health systems. Successful recruitment of a sufficient number and representative mix of hospitals requires considerable preparation, planning, and flexibility. Strategies presented here may assist future trial organizers in implementing cluster-randomized pragmatic trials. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02588664. Registered on 23 October 2015.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1745-6215
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2434-1; https://doaj.org/toc/1745-6215
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2434-1
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/f11a6c1d33d24b639aec6a13f59bc704
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.f11a6c1d33d24b639aec6a13f59bc704
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:17456215
DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2434-1