دورية أكاديمية

Intraoral Ultrasound versus MRI for Depth of Invasion Measurement in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Intraoral Ultrasound versus MRI for Depth of Invasion Measurement in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study
المؤلفون: Mikkel Kaltoft, Christoffer Holst Hahn, Marcus Wessman, Martin Lundsgaard Hansen, Tina Klitmøller Agander, Fatemeh Makouei, Irene Wessel, Tobias Todsen
المصدر: Cancers, Vol 16, Iss 3, p 637 (2024)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: oral cancer, tongue cancer, staging, depth of invasion, intraoral ultrasound, MRI, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of the tongue is the most common type of oral cavity cancer, and tumor depth of invasion (DOI) is an important prognostic factor. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of intraoral ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing DOI in patients with OSCC. Histopathological measurement of DOI was used as a reference standard. We conducted a prospective study including patients planned for surgical treatment of OSCC in the tongue. The DOI was measured in an outpatient setting by intraoral ultrasound and MRI, and was compared to the histopathological DOI measurements. Bland–Altman analysis compared the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for ultrasound and MRI, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for significance. The correlation was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. We included 30 patients: 26 with T1 or T2 tumors, and 4 with T3 tumors. The mean difference from histopathology DOI was significantly lower for ultrasound compared to MRI (0.95 mm [95% LOA −4.15 mm to 6.06 mm] vs. 1.90 mm [95% LOA −9.02 mm and 12.81 mm], p = 0.023). Ultrasound also led to significantly more correct T-stage classifications in 86.7% (26) of patients compared to 56.7% (17) for MRI, p = 0.015. The Pearson correlation between MRI and histopathology was 0.57 (p < 0.001) and the correlation between ultrasound and histopathology was 0.86 (p < 0.001). This prospective study found that intraoral ultrasound is more accurate than MRI in assessing DOI and for the T-staging of oral tongue cancers. Clinical practice and guidelines should implement intraoral ultrasound accordingly.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2072-6694
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/3/637; https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030637
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/df510254b8c942f2815908a9e86cb543
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.f510254b8c942f2815908a9e86cb543
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20726694
DOI:10.3390/cancers16030637