دورية أكاديمية

Country Report on Assessment of Quality of Care and Protection of Human Rights in Georgian Mental Health Institutions

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Country Report on Assessment of Quality of Care and Protection of Human Rights in Georgian Mental Health Institutions
المؤلفون: N. Zavradashvili, N. Makhashvili
المصدر: European Psychiatry, Vol 66, Pp S546-S546 (2023)
بيانات النشر: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Psychiatry
مصطلحات موضوعية: Psychiatry, RC435-571
الوصف: Introduction It is well established that the quality of mental health care and human rights mutually reinforcing. Until now, Georgian psychiatry is highly institutionalized, oriented towards medical treatment and suffers from a lack of recognition of the importance of the human rights concept. Objectives The purpose of the evaluation was to gather information on the current state of human rights and service quality in the inpatient mental health facilities throughout Georgia; pilot the WHO Quality rights toolkit as a major instrument to monitor mental health institutions within the country; develop recommendations for improvement of service care in psychiatric institutions and initiate changes based on the assessment results. Methods All inpatient mental health facilities operating in the country were selected for the evaluation. The assessment team conducted visits in facilities in March – May, 2019. All visits were planned in advance. All five themes of WHO Quality rights tool were covered. Interviews, observation and documentation reviews were used during the assessment process. Results Infrastructure malfunction is linked to the lack of encouraging environment, with scarce of daily and social activities. Comprehensive, patient-oriented individual recovery plan has not been initiated throughout the country. Treatment is focused mainly on medication treatment aimed at reducing / removing psychotic symptoms and timely discharging patients or “calming them down“. Taking into consideration scarcity of community-based service alternatives, the patients frequently have no choice where to get the relevant service. In general, the patients are satisfied with how they are being treated. The challenge is the incidents of violence among the patients and ensuring relevant safety measures. Educational and employment programs for persons with mental disorders are not developed in the country. Conclusions Based on the assessment findings recommendations for improvement of service care at mental health policy and institutional level were elaborated. Despite some improvements in developing community services the assessment revealed gaps in mental health care and lack of understanding of the concept of human rights. The instrument was sensitive to identify poor treatment and violation of rights but less sensitive in determining differences in existing services. It is discussed that an in-depth assessment using the specific theme of the tool can help develop specific recommendations. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0924-9338
1778-3585
Relation: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933823011537/type/journal_article; https://doaj.org/toc/0924-9338; https://doaj.org/toc/1778-3585
DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.1153
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/f89e02b534ce414983cac7b136a0af52
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.f89e02b534ce414983cac7b136a0af52
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:09249338
17783585
DOI:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.1153