دورية أكاديمية
Comparing outcomes of single-port insufflation endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and conventional open approach for breast cancer
العنوان: | Comparing outcomes of single-port insufflation endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and conventional open approach for breast cancer |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Fang Xie, Zi-Han Wang, Shan-Shan Wu, Tian-Ran Gang, Guo-Xuan Gao, Xiang Qu, Zhong-Tao Zhang |
المصدر: | World Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022) |
بيانات النشر: | BMC, 2022. |
سنة النشر: | 2022 |
المجموعة: | LCC:Surgery LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Breast cancer, Breast-conserving surgery, Endoscopic, Single-port, BREAST-Q scale, Surgery, RD1-811, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282 |
الوصف: | Abstract Background In the surgical treatment of breast cancer, the goal of surgeons is to continually create and improve minimally invasive surgical techniques to increase patients’ quality of life. Currently, routine breast-conserving surgery is often performed using two obvious incisions. Here, we compare the clinical efficacy and aesthetic outcomes of a novel technique using one incision, called ‘single-port insufflation endoscopic breast-conserving surgery’ (SIE-BCS), vs. conventional breast-conserving surgery (C-BCS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Methods A total of 180 patients with stage I or stage II breast cancer participated in this study, of whom 63 underwent SIE-BCS and 117 underwent C-BCS. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the risk of local recurrence and metastasis. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using the BREAST-Q scale. Results The mean operation time was significantly longer for SIE-BCS (194.9 ± 71.5 min) than for C-BCS (140.3 ± 56.9 min), but the mean incision length was significantly shorter for SIE-BCS than for C-BCS (3.4 ± 1.2 cm vs. 8.6 ± 2.3 cm). While both surgeries yielded similar BREAST-Q ratings for satisfaction with breasts and sexual well-being, SIE-BCS was associated with significantly better ratings for physical well-being (chest area) and psychological well-being. Additionally, SIE-BCS was associated with decreased rates of adverse effects of radiation. The preliminary analysis showed that SIE-BCS did not increase the risk of local recurrence or metastasis. Conclusion The novel single-port insufflation endoscopic assisted BCS technique is feasible, safe, and improves patients’ postoperative comfort and psychological well-being, as compared to the conventional technique. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article |
وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 1477-7819 |
Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/1477-7819 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12957-022-02798-6 |
URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/dfb12cb60dfd4f5baf89f2cf22aa5809 |
رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.fb12cb60dfd4f5baf89f2cf22aa5809 |
قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
تدمد: | 14777819 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1186/s12957-022-02798-6 |