دورية أكاديمية

Accuracy of Extraoral Digital Impressions with Multi-Unit Implants

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Accuracy of Extraoral Digital Impressions with Multi-Unit Implants
المؤلفون: Manuel António Sampaio-Fernandes, Ricardo Pinto, Paulo Rocha Almeida, Maria Margarida Sampaio-Fernandes, Duarte Marques, Maria Helena Figueiral
المصدر: Applied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 15, p 8769 (2023)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Technology
LCC:Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
LCC:Biology (General)
LCC:Physics
LCC:Chemistry
مصطلحات موضوعية: three-dimensional scanner, dental CAD/CAM, digital dentistry, digital implant impression, extraoral scanner, full-arch rehabilitation, Technology, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), TA1-2040, Biology (General), QH301-705.5, Physics, QC1-999, Chemistry, QD1-999
الوصف: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of impressions made using two different silicones and corresponding stone casts in full-arch implant rehabilitation, using two laboratory scanners. A master model with six dental implants was created, scanned with a 12-megapixel scanner and used as digital master model. Ten implant impressions were obtained via two silicone impressions systems—Coltene® and Zhermack®—using the open-tray technique and poured gypsum. Two extraoral scanning systems (S600 ARTI Zirkonzhan® and Identica T500 Medit®) were used to scan the impressions and stone casts. Best-fit superimpositions were conducted between the master model and the virtual models obtained. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered. The accuracy of the Medit® scanner was 82.26 [53.18; 111.34] µm for Coltene® silicone and 87.43 [72.00; 102.86] µm for Zhermack® silicone, and the accuracy of the Zirkonzhan® scanner was 69.90 [62.37; 77.43] µm for Coltene® silicone and 80.67 [65.77; 95.57] µm for Zhermack® silicone, without significant differences between scanners. When comparing the two silicones, no significant differences were found for the Medit® (p = 0.112) or Zirkonzhan® scanners (p = 0.162). The Zhermack® scanner showed better accuracy than the corresponding stone casts in the two scanners, Medit® (p = 0.019) and Zirkonzahn® (p = 0.002). The extraoral digitalization of impressions in edentulous dental arches with six implants proves to be a valid technique.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2076-3417
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/15/8769; https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417
DOI: 10.3390/app13158769
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/ff67a6b752984a84a61da5606e9a9b78
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.ff67a6b752984a84a61da5606e9a9b78
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20763417
DOI:10.3390/app13158769