مورد إلكتروني

Academic Integrity at Risk. Joan Robinson's Interpretation of Marxian Economics and Her Ethic Critique of Orthodox Economic Theory

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Academic Integrity at Risk. Joan Robinson's Interpretation of Marxian Economics and Her Ethic Critique of Orthodox Economic Theory
عناروين إضافية: Academic Integrity at Risk. Joan Robinson's Interpretation of Marxian Economics and Her Ethic Critique of Orthodox Economic Theory
Integridade acadêmica em risco. A interpretação de Joan Robinson da economia marxista e sua crítica ética da teoria econômica ortodoxa
المصدر: Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022); 13-23; Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2022); 13-23; 2386-5768
بيانات النشر: Ediciones Complutense 2022-05-05
تفاصيل مُضافة: Jiménez Contreras, Baruc
نوع الوثيقة: Electronic Resource
مستخلص: During the twentieth century, Joan Robinson introduced Marx's political economy into academic discussions of economic thought. This article argues that Robinson's work generates a proposal for academic integrity in economic ideas through an ethical vision of Marx's discourse and an epistemic critique of orthodox economic theory. Robinson's research shows that economic theory has been characterized by hiding the interests of the bourgeoisie, consolidating an "unethical behavior". Following Macfarlane's (2009) work on virtue theory, it is possible to identify in Robinson's production virtues that can enhance the academic integrity of economists.
 Durante el siglo XX, Joan Robinson introdujo la economía política de Marx en las discusiones académicas del pensamiento económico. Este artículo sostiene que el trabajo de Robinson genera una propuesta de integridad académica en la economía a través de una visión ética del discurso de Marx y una crítica epistémica de la teoría económica ortodoxa. La investigación de Robinson muestra que la teoría económica se ha caracterizado por ocultar los intereses de la burguesía, consolidando un "comportamiento poco ético". Siguiendo el trabajo de Macfarlane (2009) sobre la teoría de la virtud, es posible identificar en la producción de Robinson virtudes que pueden mejorar la integridad académica de los economistas.
Durante o século 20, Joan Robinson introduziu a economia política de Marx nas discussões acadêmicas do pensamento econômico. Este artigo argumenta que a obra de Robinson gera uma proposta de integridade acadêmica em economia por meio de uma visão ética do discurso de Marx e uma crítica epistêmica da teoria econômica ortodoxa. A pesquisa de Robinson mostra que a teoria econômica tem se caracterizado por esconder os interesses da burguesia, consolidando o "comportamento antiético". Seguindo o trabalho de Macfarlane (2009) sobre a teoria da virtude, é possível identificar virtudes na produção de Robinson que podem melhorar a integridade acadêmica dos economistas.
مصطلحات الفهرس: academic integrity, Joan Robinson, Post-Keynesian economics, Karl Marx, orthodox Economic Theory, integridad académica, economía post-keynesiana, teoría económica ortodoxa, integridade acadêmica, economia pós-keynesiana, teoria econômica ortodoxa, info:eu-repo/semantics/article, info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, Artículo revisado por pares
URL: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE/article/view/78669
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE/article/view/78669/4564456560448
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE/article/view/78669/4564456560448
*ref*/An open letter to Greg Mankiw. (2012). The Critical Quarterly, 54(2), 10-11. https://login.bucm.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/open-letter-greg-mankiw/docview/1024162694/se-2?accountid=14514 Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1-19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3749051 Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. [1979] (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford Universi-ty Press. Blosser, J. (2016). More Than Free Markets: Adam Smith and the Virtue of Responsibil-ity. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 36(1), 163-179. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44504814 Bretag, T. (2018). Academic Integrity. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Man-agement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.147 Callahan, D. (2003). Principlism and Communitarianism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5), 287-291. Clouser, K. D. (1990). A critique of Principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom), 15(2), 219-236. 10.1093/jmp/15.2.219 Champernowne, D. G. (1936). Unemployment, Basic and Monetary: the Classical Analysis and the Keynesian. The Review of Economic Studies, 3(3), 201-216. 10.2307/2967628 Dobb, M. (1929). A Sceptical View of the Theory of Wages. The Economic Journal, 39(156), 506-519. 10.2307/2223662 Douglass, R. (2020). Bernard Mandeville on the Use and Abuse of Hypocrisy. Political Studies, 0032321720972617. 10.1177/0032321720972617 Emami, Z. (1992). History versus Equilibrium: Joan Robinson on Teaching Econo-mics. International Journal of Social Economics, 19(10), 83-94. 10.1108/EUM0000000000505 Gaido, D., & Quiroga, M. (2021). Marxism in the Age of Imperialism – the Second Internation-al. In A. Callinicos, S. Kouvelakis & L. Pradella (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Post-Marxism (pp. 51-65). Routledge. Haakonssen, K. (1981). The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press. Harrod, R. F. (1
الإتاحة: Open access content. Open access content
Derechos de autor 2022 Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought
ملاحظة: application/pdf
Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022); 13-23
English
أرقام أخرى: S9M oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/78669
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE/article/view/78669
1331302281
المصدر المساهم: UNIV COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID
From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
رقم الأكسشن: edsoai.on1331302281
قاعدة البيانات: OAIster