دورية أكاديمية

Long-term survival analysis after endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction: comparison with emergency diverting colostomy

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Long-term survival analysis after endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction: comparison with emergency diverting colostomy
المؤلفون: Scomparin, Rodrigo Corsato, Martins, Bruno Costa, Lenz, Luciano, Bento, Luiza Haendchen, Marques, Carlos Sparapam, Safatle-Ribeiro, Adriana, Ribeiro Jr, Ulysses, Nahas, Sergio Carlos, Maluf-Filho, Fauze
المصدر: Clinics. January 2020 75
بيانات النشر: Faculdade de Medicina / USP, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Malignant Colonic Obstruction, Emergency Surgery, Colonic Endoscopic Stent, SEMS, Tumor Seeding
الوصف: The use of colorectal self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) as bridge therapy for malignant colorectal obstruction was first reported more than 20 years ago. However, its use remains controversial. Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term survival of patients with potentially resectable malignant colorectal obstruction who had undergone colorectal SEMS placement and emergency surgery. Methods: This study was a retrospective analyses. Patients who received treatment between 2009 and 2017 were included. According to the eligibility criteria, 21 patients were included in the SEMS group and 67 patients were included in the surgical group.. Results: The majority of the patients in the SEMS group were female (57.1%), whereas the majority of those in the surgical group were male (53.7%). The median follow-up time was 60 months for both groups with the same interquartile range of 60 months. There was no difference in the overall survival rate (log rank p=0.873) and disease-free survival rate (log rank p=0.2821) in the five-year analysis. There was no difference in local recurrence rates (38.1% vs. 22.4%, p=0.14) or distant recurrence rates (33.3% vs. 50.7%, p=0.16) in the SEMS and the surgical groups. Technical and clinical success rates of endoscopic stenting were 95.3% and 85.7%, respectively. There were no immediate adverse events (AEs). Severe AEs included perforation (14.3%), silent perforation (4.7%), reobstruction (14.3%), and bleeding (14.3%). Mild AEs included pain (42.8%), tenesmus (9.5%), and incontinence (4.76%). The limitations of this study was retrospective and was conducted at a single center. Conclusions: No differences in disease-free and overall survival rates were observed in the five-year analysis of patients with resectable colorectal cancer who had undergone SEMS placement or colostomy for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction. Patients in the SEMS group had a higher rate of primary anastomosis and a lower rate of temporary colostomy than did those in the surgery group.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: text/html
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1807-5932
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2046
URL الوصول: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322020000100301
حقوق: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
رقم الأكسشن: edssci.S1807.59322020000100301
قاعدة البيانات: SciELO
الوصف
تدمد:18075932
DOI:10.6061/clinics/2020/e2046