International consensus statement on the design, delivery and evaluation of sport-based interventions aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison
العنوان: | International consensus statement on the design, delivery and evaluation of sport-based interventions aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Murray, Conor, Coyle, Brendan, Morgan, Haydyn, Marder, Ian, Woods, David, Haughey, Tandy, Maycock, Matthew, Genovesi, Federico, Meek, Rosie, Parker, Andrew, Smith, Andy, Kay, Chris, Brink, Gerko, Rovers, Hubert, Haudenhuyse, Rein, Roe, Daniel, Contreras-Osorio, Falonn, Donohue, Brad, Bohall, Greg, Martinez, Nagore, Martos-Garcia, Daniel, Whitley, Meredith, Norman, Mark, Demalija, Rifat, Sherry, Emma, Chitsawang, Nathee, Adebayo Aderonmu, Kehinde, Breslin, Gavin |
المصدر: | BMJ Open. 14(1) |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | FORENSIC MEDICINE, PSYCHIATRY, PUBLIC HEALTH, Protocols & guidelines, SPORTS MEDICINE, Social Interaction, Samhällsvetenskap/Humaniora, Social Sciences/Humanities |
الوصف: | Objective: To develop an international consensus statement to advise on designing, delivering and evaluating sport-based interventions (SBIs) aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison.Design: Modified Delphi using two rounds of survey questionnaires and two consensus workshops.Participants: A multidisciplinary panel of more than 40 experts from 15 international jurisdictions was formed, including representation from the following groups and stakeholders: professionals working in the justice system; officials from sport federations and organisations; academics with research experience of prisons, secure forensic mental health settings and SBIs; and policy-makers in criminal justice and sport.Results: A core research team and advisory board developed the initial rationale, statement and survey. This survey produced qualitative data which was analysed thematically. The findings were presented at an in-person workshop. Panellists discussed the findings, and, using a modified nominal group technique, reached a consensus on objectives to be included in a revised statement. The core research team and advisory board revised the statement and recirculated it with a second survey. Findings from the second survey were discussed at a second, virtual, workshop. The core research team and advisory board further revised the consensus statement and recirculated it asking panellists for further comments. This iterative process resulted in seven final statement items; all participants have confirmed that they agreed with the content, objectives and recommendations of the final statement.Conclusions: The statement can be used to assist those that design, deliver and evaluate SBIs by providing guidance on: (1) minimum levels of competence for those designing and delivering SBIs; (2) the design and delivery of inclusive programmes prioritising disadvantaged groups; and (3) evaluation measures which are carefully calibrated both to capture proposed programme outcomes and to advance an understanding of the systems, processes and experiences of sport engagement in prison. |
وصف الملف: | electronic |
URL الوصول: | https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-8115 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075792 https://gih.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1838286/FULLTEXT01.pdf |
قاعدة البيانات: | SwePub |
تدمد: | 20446055 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075792 |