How can patient preferences be used and communicated in the regulatory evaluation of medicinal products?: Findings and recommendations from IMI PREFER and call to action
العنوان: | How can patient preferences be used and communicated in the regulatory evaluation of medicinal products?: Findings and recommendations from IMI PREFER and call to action |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Janssens, Rosanne, Barbier, Liese, Muller, Mireille, Cleemput, Irina, Stoeckert, Isabelle, Whichello, Chiara, Levitan, Bennett, Hammad, Tarek A., Girvalaki, Charis, Ventura, Juan-Jose, Schölin Bywall, Karin, Pinto, Cathy Anne, Schoefs, Elise, Katz, Eva G., Kihlbom, Ulrik, Huys, Isabelle |
المصدر: | Frontiers in Pharmacology. 14 |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | patient preferences, patient experience data, regulatory evaluation, scientific advice, benefit-risk assessment, clinical trial endpoint selection, post-marketing assessment |
الوصف: | Objective: Patients have unique insights and are (in-)directly affected by each decision taken throughout the life cycle of medicinal products. Patient preference studies (PPS) assess what matters most to patients, how much, and what trade-offs patients are willing to make. IMI PREFER was a six-year European public-private partnership under the Innovative Medicines Initiative that developed recommendations on how to assess and use PPS in medical product decision-making, including in the regulatory evaluation of medicinal products. This paper aims to summarize findings and recommendations from IMI PREFER regarding i) PPS applications in regulatory evaluation, ii) when and how to consult with regulators on PPS, iii) how to reflect PPS in regulatory communication and iv) barriers and open questions for PPS in regulatory decision-making.Methods: PREFER performed six literature reviews, 143 interviews and eight focus group discussions with regulators, patient representatives, industry representatives, Health Technology Assessment bodies, payers, academics, and clincians between October 2016 and May 2022.Results: i) With respect to PPS applications, prior to the conduct of clinical trials of medicinal products, PPS could inform regulators' understanding of patients' unmet needs and relevant endpoints during horizon scanning activities and scientific advice. During the evaluation of a marketing authorization application, PPS could inform: a) the assessment of whether a product meets an unmet need, b) whether patient-relevant clinical trial endpoints and outcomes were studied, c) the understanding of patient-relevant effect sizes and acceptable trade-offs, and d) the identification of key (un-)favorable effects and uncertainties. ii) With respect to consulting with regulators on PPS, PPS researchers should ideally have early discussions with regulators (e.g., during scientific advice) on the PPS design and research questions. iii) Regarding external PPS communication, PPS could be reflected in the assessment report and product information (e.g., the European Public Assessment Report and the Summary of Product Characteristics). iv) Barriers relevant to the use of PPS in regulatory evaluation include a lack of PPS use cases and demonstrated impact on regulatory decision-making, and need for (financial) incentives, guidance and quality criteria for implementing PPS results in regulatory decision-making. Open questions concerning regulatory PPS use include: a) should a product independent broad approach to the design of PPS be taken and/or a product-specific one, b) who should optimally be financing, designing, conducting, and coordinating PPS, c) when (within and/or outside clinical trials) to perform PPS, and d) how can PPS use best be operationalized in regulatory decisions.Conclusion: PPS have high potential to inform regulators on key unmet needs, endpoints, benefits, and risks that matter most to patients and their acceptable trade-offs. Regulatory guidelines, templates and checklists, together with incentives are needed to foster structural and transparent PPS submission and evaluation in regulatory decision-making. More PPS case studies should be conducted and submitted for regulatory assessment to enable regulatory discussion and increase regulators' experience with PPS implementation and communication in regulatory evaluations. |
وصف الملف: | electronic |
URL الوصول: | https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-511897 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1192770 https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1799156/FULLTEXT01.pdf |
قاعدة البيانات: | SwePub |
تدمد: | 16639812 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1192770 |