Comparative Judgement and Affect: A Case Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative Judgement and Affect: A Case Study
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Palisse, Jennifer, King, Deborah, MacLean, Mark, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA)
المصدر: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 2021Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (43rd, Singapore, 2021).
الإتاحة: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. GPO Box 2747, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. Tel: +61-8-8363-0288; Fax: +61-8-8362-9288; e-mail: sales@merga.net.au; Web site: http://www.merga.net.au/
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 8
تاريخ النشر: 2021
نوع الوثيقة: Speeches/Meeting Papers
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Decision Making, Case Studies, Peer Evaluation, Comparative Analysis, Pilot Projects, Problem Solving, Mathematics Instruction, Calculus, Cognitive Ability, Undergraduate Students, Task Analysis, Student Attitudes
مستخلص: Comparative judgement is a relatively new way of facilitating peer-assessment where students are shown pairs of other students' work and judge which of the two is better. Literature on example-based learning suggests that students should be able to learn from comparative judgement. We present the case of one student, Josie, whose understanding of rational inequalities did not improve while assessing other students work comparatively. We argue that her self-explanation attempts were limited because comparative judgement created an environment that threatened her goal of understanding. Knowing the correct answer may have helped alleviate some of these issues.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
رقم الأكسشن: ED616182
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC