دورية أكاديمية
A Comprehensive Reanalysis of the Metacognitive Self-Regulation Scale from the MSLQ
| العنوان: | A Comprehensive Reanalysis of the Metacognitive Self-Regulation Scale from the MSLQ |
|---|---|
| اللغة: | English |
| المؤلفون: | Tock, Jamie L., Moxley, Jerad H. |
| المصدر: | Metacognition and Learning. Apr 2017 12(1):79-111. |
| الإتاحة: | Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 33 |
| تاريخ النشر: | 2017 |
| نوع الوثيقة: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Learning Strategies, Questionnaires, Structural Equation Models, Metacognition, Psychometrics, Factor Analysis, Study Habits, Path Analysis |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11409-016-9161-y |
| تدمد: | 1556-1623 |
| مستخلص: | The metacognitive self-regulation (MSR) scale is among the most widely used measures of metacognition in educational research. However, the psychometric properties and validity of the scale have not been well established. A series of analyses on a college sample were performed to address this issue. In Study 1, a split-sample exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to test the one-factor specification of the MSR scale. Time and study environment (TSE), total study time, and cumulative grade performance average (cGPA) were introduced as outcome variables in a structural equation model (SEM) to examine the factors suggested by the EFA. The results of Study 1 indicated poor one-factor model fit and suggested two and three-factor models provided improved fits of the sample data. Results from the SEM indicated the novel factors from the two and three-factor models had different relationships with the outcome variables than the originally specified one-factor model. In Study 2, a modified one-factor model was introduced that consisted of nine items and was named metacognitive self-regulation revised (MSR-R). Five additional samples were included to replicate the model fit for the revised model specification. Finally, a path analysis was performed to examine the relationship of the MSR-R to variables from Study 1. The results of Study 2 revealed improved psychometric properties and reliability for the MSR-R. An indirect relationship emerged between MSR-R and cGPA through TSE. In conclusion, convincing evidence for replacing the MSR was found and implications of the revised scale for future studies was discussed. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 89 |
| Entry Date: | 2017 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | EJ1133224 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | ERIC |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1556-1623 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11409-016-9161-y |