دورية أكاديمية

The Effect of Changing the Balance between Right and Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Different Creativity Tasks: A Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Effect of Changing the Balance between Right and Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Different Creativity Tasks: A Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Study
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Peña, Javier (ORCID 0000-0002-0041-7020), Sampedro, Agurne, Gómez-Gastiasoro, Ainara, Ibarretxe-Bilbao, Naroa, Zubiaurre-Elorza, Leire, Aguiar, Covadonga, Ojeda, Natalia
المصدر: Journal of Creative Behavior. Dec 2021 55(4):899-915.
الإتاحة: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
تاريخ النشر: 2021
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Creativity, Acoustics, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Creative Thinking, Comparative Analysis, Creativity Tests, Arithmetic, Problem Solving, Stimulation, Perception, Task Analysis, Scores
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Remote Associates Test, Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking
DOI: 10.1002/jocb.496
تدمد: 0022-0175
مستخلص: Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) increases performance in some perceptual tasks. However, little is known about its effect on creativity. Although dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been postulated as an important cortical area related to creativity, the relative role of left and right DLPFC is still unclear. We aimed to compare the effect of anodal left/cathodal right (L + R-) and cathodal left/anodal right (L - R+) tRNS over the DLPFC. Eighty-four participants were randomly assigned to L + R-, L-R+ or sham group. Current was set at 2 mA (100-500 Hz) with a 1 mA direct current offset (20 min). Creativity was assessed before and during tRNS with the Remotes Associates Test (RAT), Unusual Uses (UU) and Picture Completion (PC) from Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, nine-dot problem and matchstick arithmetic problems. Bootstrapped analysis of covariance (under-stimulation scores controlling for baseline) showed that L + R- and L - R+ groups had higher scores than sham in UU whereas only L + R- improved in RAT compared to sham. The L - R+ group performed significantly better than L + R- and sham groups in PC, nine-dot problem and matchstick arithmetic problems. L + R- DLPFC may help verbal creative thinking whereas the L - R + seems to produce a "releasing effect" through insight problem solving and originality.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
رقم الأكسشن: EJ1318910
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:0022-0175
DOI:10.1002/jocb.496