دورية أكاديمية

Administration and Results of a State Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Academic Standards in Science for Students Who Are Blind and Have Low Vision

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Administration and Results of a State Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Academic Standards in Science for Students Who Are Blind and Have Low Vision
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: McCarthy, Tessa, Schles, Rachel Anne (ORCID 0000-0003-4494-3900), Moore, Debra W.
المصدر: Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. Jan-Feb 2023 117(1):50-61.
الإتاحة: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
تاريخ النشر: 2023
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Elementary Education
Grade 4
Intermediate Grades
Grade 8
Junior High Schools
Middle Schools
Secondary Education
Grade 11
High Schools
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Alternative Assessment, Science Education, Students with Disabilities, Blindness, Visual Impairments, Testing Accommodations, Intellectual Disability, Test Content, Testing, Test Wiseness, Student Characteristics, Elementary Secondary Education, Grade 4, Grade 8, Grade 11
DOI: 10.1177/0145482X221149746
تدمد: 0145-482X
1559-1476
مستخلص: Introduction: This study evaluated performance and engagement on the tactile science alternate assessment based on alternate academic standards (AA-AAS). This assessment was designed for students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments (i.e., blindness and low vision). Four primary research questions guided this study. What were the demographic characteristics of the students who took the tactile AA-AAS-science? How did students who took the tactile AA-AAS-science perform? What accommodations, accessibility options, and communication strategies were employed in the administration of the tactile AA-AAS-science? Was there a correlation between any administration practices and improved student results? Methods: Thirty-four students with visual impairments and significant intellectual disabilities participated in the 2017 administration of the AA-AAS-science. Post-hoc analyses of the testing strategies were conducted using video recordings of each assessment. Videos were coded for accommodations, student performance, engagement, and appropriateness of the assessment for each student. Results: The tactile materials were the primary accommodation provided to students and were totally novel in 79.1% of the administrations. Students were not permitted to thoroughly explore materials. In many cases, the exam content was determined to be too difficult for the students. Discussion: This study supports the literature and suggests benefits in academic instruction for all students. For academic instruction to be meaningful, students need appropriate accommodations and consistent materials. Implications for Practitioners: Test administrators for assessments based on alternate academic standards should use familiar materials during a test administration, preferably the same materials used during instruction. It is also important for teachers to prepare students and allow for time to systematically explore tactile materials. Teachers can support students by including academic goals in the individualized education program.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
رقم الأكسشن: EJ1370290
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:0145-482X
1559-1476
DOI:10.1177/0145482X221149746