دورية أكاديمية

Implementing Alternative Assessment in a Communicative English Skills Course at Three Ethiopian Universities

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Implementing Alternative Assessment in a Communicative English Skills Course at Three Ethiopian Universities
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Minda, Motuma Hirpassa, Chaka, Chaka (ORCID 0000-0003-3558-4141)
المصدر: MEXTESOL Journal. 2023 47(2).
الإتاحة: MEXTESOL Journal. Bernardo Couto 48, Col. Cuauhtemoc, Alcadía Cuauhtemoc, Ciudad de Mexico, 06880, Mexico. Tel: +55-55-66-87-49; e-mail: mextesoljournal@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.mextesol.net/journal/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
تاريخ النشر: 2023
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Communicative Competence (Languages), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Foreign Countries, Universities, Student Attitudes, Grammar, Teaching Methods, Vocabulary Development, Teacher Attitudes, Language Teachers, Undergraduate Students, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation
مصطلحات جغرافية: Ethiopia
تدمد: 2395-9908
مستخلص: This study examined the implementation of an alternative assessment in a course, Communicative English Skills Course (CESC), at three Ethiopian universities. The study mainly focused on multi-assessor strategies, multiple assessment tools, and comprehensive, progressive, continuous, and relevant assessment used by instructors at these three universities. Two sets of questionnaires, an instructor questionnaire and a student questionnaire, were administered to collect its data from 128 instructors and 241 students. A maximum variation sampling was used to select instructors from the three universities and stratified sampling to select students from these three universities. Data sets were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and Mann-Whitney U Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test. There are two findings of this study that are worth mentioning. First, an instructor-based assessment strategy (M = 4.0) dominated the process of evaluating student learning in CESC. Second, the overall assessment strategies employed by instructors at the three universities lacked progressiveness, continuity, and relevance, and focused more on reading, grammar and vocabulary than on the other language domains of CESC. There are two implications for this study. First, most of the instructors at the three universities preferred traditional assessment (TA) methods to alternative assessment (AA) methods and found the former more convenient to use in CESC than the latter. Second, the instructors denied the apparently existing mismatch between their assessment practices and CESC's recommended assessment methods.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
رقم الأكسشن: EJ1397119
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC