دورية أكاديمية
Scanpath Regularity as an Index of Reading Comprehension
| العنوان: | Scanpath Regularity as an Index of Reading Comprehension |
|---|---|
| اللغة: | English |
| المؤلفون: | Diane C. Mézière (ORCID |
| المصدر: | Scientific Studies of Reading. 2024 28(1):79-100. |
| الإتاحة: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| تاريخ النشر: | 2024 |
| نوع الوثيقة: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Oral Reading, Reading Tests, Achievement Tests, Reading Comprehension, Undergraduate Students, Eye Movements |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: | Australia |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Gray Oral Reading Test, Wide Range Achievement Test |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10888438.2023.2232063 |
| تدمد: | 1088-8438 1532-799X |
| مستخلص: | Purpose: Recent research on the potential of using eye-tracking to measure reading comprehension ability suggests that the relationship between standard eye-tracking measures and reading comprehension is influenced by differences in task demands between comprehension assessments. We compared standard eye-tracking measures and scanpath regularity as predictors of reading comprehension scores. Method: We used a dataset in which 79 participants (mean age: 22 years, 82% females, 76% monolingual English speakers) were administered three widely-used reading comprehension assessments with varying task demands while their eye movements were monitored: the "York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension"; (YARC), the "Gray Oral Reading Test"; (GORT-5), and the sentence comprehension subtest of the "Wide Range Achievement Test"; (WRAT-4). Results: Results showed that scanpath regularity measures, similarly to standard eye-tracking measures, were influenced by differences in task demands between the three tests. Nevertheless, both types of eye-tracking measures made unique contributions as predictors of comprehension and the best set of predictors included both standard eye-tracking measures and at least one scanpath measure across tests. Conclusion: The results provide evidence that scanpaths capture differences in eye-movement patterns missed by standard eye-tracking measures. Overall, the results highlight the effect of task demands on eye-movement behavior and suggest that reading goals and task demands need to be considered when interpreting eye-tracking data. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | EJ1406045 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | ERIC |
PDF full text from Publisher 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1088-8438 1532-799X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1080/10888438.2023.2232063 |