دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Do Instructional Manipulation Checks Measure Inattention or Miscomprehension?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Do Instructional Manipulation Checks Measure Inattention or Miscomprehension?
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Nazila Babakhani, Leo Paas (ORCID 0000-0002-6611-3038), Sara Dolnicar (ORCID 0000-0001-5176-3161)
المصدر: International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2023 26(6):773-784.
الإتاحة: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
تاريخ النشر: 2023
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Attention, Attention Control, Online Surveys, Computer Mediated Communication, Comprehension, Questionnaires, Eye Movements, Time
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2022.2111064
تدمد: 1364-5579
1464-5300
مستخلص: Instructional Manipulation Checks (IMCs) are intended to detect inattention, a common occurrence in survey responding. We use eye tracking to empirically assess the attention that survey respondents dedicate to a short and a long IMC. We find that all 21 respondents pass the short IMC. In contrast, six respondents fail the long IMC. Our eye-tracking results show that some respondents who fail the long IMC check allocate more cognitive effort and time to processing this check than others, suggesting that lack of comprehension rather than inattention may be the relevant underlying mechanism for their failure. For other respondents failing the IMC, lack of attention and speeding is more likely to be the culprit. These findings culminate into the suggestion that future researchers should assess the time that respondents failing an IMC dedicated to this check to distinguish between miscomprehension (long time) and inattention (short time).
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
رقم الأكسشن: EJ1406170
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:1364-5579
1464-5300
DOI:10.1080/13645579.2022.2111064