دورية أكاديمية
Continuous Improvement, Institutional Review Boards, and Resistance to Practitioner Scholarship
| العنوان: | Continuous Improvement, Institutional Review Boards, and Resistance to Practitioner Scholarship |
|---|---|
| اللغة: | English |
| المؤلفون: | Brandi Hinnant-Crawford (ORCID |
| المصدر: | Educational Researcher. 2024 53(1):46-53. |
| الإتاحة: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| تاريخ النشر: | 2024 |
| نوع الوثيقة: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Action Research, Educational Cooperation, Participatory Research, Research Methodology, Research Administration, Ethics, Doctoral Programs |
| DOI: | 10.3102/0013189X231208413 |
| تدمد: | 0013-189X 1935-102X |
| مستخلص: | In this essay, we explore the tension between research using continuous improvement (CI) paradigms, such as improvement science, and conventional research, and the role and regulation of Institutional Review Board (IRB) oversight. We argue that the current regulatory structure privileges traditional research and hinders collaborative inquiry that centers the voice and agency of those traditionally marginalized. We also question whether IRBs should limit CI efforts required of educational leaders as part of their jobs. We offer recommendations for how IRBs and scholar-practitioners can together support CI efforts. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | EJ1412459 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | ERIC |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 0013-189X 1935-102X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3102/0013189X231208413 |