دورية أكاديمية
Distinct Mechanisms of Attentional Suppression: Exploration of Trait Factors Underlying Cued- and Learned-Suppression
| العنوان: | Distinct Mechanisms of Attentional Suppression: Exploration of Trait Factors Underlying Cued- and Learned-Suppression |
|---|---|
| اللغة: | English |
| المؤلفون: | Matthieu Chidharom (ORCID |
| المصدر: | Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2024 9. |
| الإتاحة: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| تاريخ النشر: | 2024 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Eye Institute (NEI) (DHHS/NIH) |
| Contract Number: | R15EY030247 |
| نوع الوثيقة: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Attention, Cues, Visual Aids, Short Term Memory, Personality Traits, Learning Processes |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s41235-024-00554-w |
| تدمد: | 2365-7464 |
| مستخلص: | Attention allows us to focus on relevant information while ignoring distractions. Effective suppression of distracting information is crucial for efficient visual search. Recent studies have developed two paradigms to investigate attentional suppression: cued-suppression which is based on top-down control, and learned-suppression which is based on selection history. While both types of suppression reportedly engage proactive control, it remains unclear whether they rely on shared mechanisms. This study aimed to determine the relationship between cued- and learned-suppression. In a within-subjects design, 54 participants performed a cued-suppression task where pre-cues indicated upcoming target or distractor colors, and a learned-suppression task where a salient color distractor was present or absent. No significant correlation emerged between performance in the two tasks, suggesting distinct suppression mechanisms. Cued-suppression correlated with visual working memory capacity, indicating reliance on explicit control. In contrast, learned-suppression correlated with everyday distractibility, suggesting implicit control based on regularities. These results provide evidence for heterogeneous proactive control mechanisms underlying cued- and learned-suppression. While both engage inhibition, cued-suppression relies on deliberate top-down control modulated by working memory, whereas learned-suppression involves implicit suppression shaped by selection history and distractibility traits. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | EJ1422616 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | ERIC |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 2365-7464 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s41235-024-00554-w |