دورية أكاديمية

Reading and Writing Relations Are Not Uniform: They Differ by the Linguistic Grain Size, Developmental Phase, and Measurement

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Reading and Writing Relations Are Not Uniform: They Differ by the Linguistic Grain Size, Developmental Phase, and Measurement
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Young-Suk Grace Kim (ORCID 0000-0002-4328-3843), Alissa Wolters, Joong won Lee
المصدر: Review of Educational Research. 2024 94(3):311-342.
الإتاحة: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 32
تاريخ النشر: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (DHHS/NIH)
Contract Number: R305A170113
R305A180055
R305C190007
P50HD052120
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Early Childhood Education
Preschool Education
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Reading Writing Relationship, Reading Comprehension, Spelling, Age Differences, Meta Analysis, Reading Tests, Research Reports, Elementary Secondary Education, Writing (Composition), Oral Language, Story Telling, Task Analysis, Vocabulary Skills, Syntax, Writing Skills, Second Languages, Chinese, Alphabets, Written Language, Preschool Education, Higher Education
DOI: 10.3102/00346543231178830
تدمد: 0034-6543
1935-1046
مستخلص: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate reading-writing relations. Beyond the overall relation, we systematically investigated moderation of the relation as a function of linguistic grain size (word reading and spelling versus reading comprehension and written composition), measurement of reading comprehension (e.g., multiple choice, open-ended, cloze), and written composition (e.g., writing quality, writing productivity, writing fluency, writing syntax), and developmental phase of reading and writing (grade levels as a proxy). A total of 395 studies (k = 2,265, N = 120,669) met inclusion criteria. Overall, reading and writing were strongly related (r = 0.72). However, the relation differed depending on the subskills of reading and writing such that word reading and spelling were strongly related (r = 0.82) whereas reading comprehension and written composition were moderately related (r = 0.44). In addition, the word reading-spelling relation was stronger for primary-grade students (r = 0.82) than for university students/adults (r = 0.69). The relation of reading comprehension with written composition differed depending on measurement of reading comprehension and written composition--reading comprehension measured by multiple choice and open-ended tasks had a stronger relation with writing quality than reading comprehension measured by oral retell tasks; and reading comprehension had moderate relations with writing quality, writing vocabulary, writing syntax, and writing conventions but had weak relations with writing productivity and writing fluency. Relations tended to be stronger when reliability was higher, and the relation between word reading and spelling was stronger for alphabetic languages (r = 0.83) than for Chinese (r = 0.71). These results add important nuances about the nature of relations between reading and writing.
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2024
رقم الأكسشن: EJ1423184
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:0034-6543
1935-1046
DOI:10.3102/00346543231178830