دورية أكاديمية

A Hybrid Pragmatic and Factorial Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial for an Anti-Racist, Multilevel Intervention to Improve Mental Health Equity in High Schools

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A Hybrid Pragmatic and Factorial Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial for an Anti-Racist, Multilevel Intervention to Improve Mental Health Equity in High Schools
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Marta I. Mulawa (ORCID 0000-0001-9687-421X), Sharron L. Docherty, Donald E. Bailey, Rosa M. Gonzalez-Guarda, Isaac M. Lipkus, Schenita D. Randolph, Qing Yang, Wei Pan
المصدر: Prevention Science. 2024 25(3):486-496.
الإتاحة: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
تاريخ النشر: 2024
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Racism, Access to Health Care, Mental Health, Racial Discrimination, Program Evaluation, School Health Services, Evaluation Methods, Adolescents, High Schools
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01626-x
تدمد: 1389-4986
1573-6695
مستخلص: Systemic racism is pervasive in US society and disproportionately limits opportunities for education, work, and health for historically marginalized and minoritized racial and ethnic groups, making it an urgent issue of social justice. Because systemic racism is a social determinant of health prevalent across multiple social and institutional structures, it requires multilevel intervention approaches using effective designs and analytic methods to measure and evaluate outcomes. Racism is a fundamental cause of poor health outcomes, including mental health outcomes; thus, mental health services and programs that address racism and discrimination are key to promoting positive mental health of racial and ethnic minority youth. While multilevel interventions are well-suited for improving outcomes like youth mental health disparities, their evaluation poses unique methodological challenges, requiring specialized design and analytic approaches. There has been limited methodological guidance provided to researchers on how to test multilevel interventions using approaches that balance methodological rigor, practicality, and acceptability across stakeholder groups, especially within communities most affected by systemic racism. This paper addresses this gap by providing an example of how to rigorously evaluate a hypothetical, theoretically based, multilevel intervention promoting mental health equity in three US school systems using an anti-racist approach intervening at the macro- (i.e., school system), meso- (i.e., school), and micro- (i.e., family and student) levels to improve mental health in adolescents. We describe the design, sample size considerations, and analytic methods to comprehensively evaluate its effectiveness while exploring the extent to which the components interact synergistically to improve outcomes. The methodological approach proposed can be adapted to other multilevel interventions that include strategies addressing macro-, meso-, and micro-levels of influence.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
رقم الأكسشن: EJ1430315
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:1389-4986
1573-6695
DOI:10.1007/s11121-023-01626-x